Skip to main content

Mark J. Pettingill

234
Speeches
55,844
Words Spoken
18
Sittings Active
19 May 2017 House of Assembly
Official Hansard Report
5 words
Yes, it is two n’s.
19 May 2017 House of Assembly
Official Hansard Report
15 words
I think that might have got caught anyway. Hon. Trevor G. Moniz: Yes, just to—
19 May 2017 House of Assembly
Official Hansard Report
1 words
Sorry.
19 May 2017 House of Assembly
Official Hansard Report
62 words
Very long day and night, but we need to delete the word “handling” from the su mmary [sic]. . . from the initial citation to the Bill as well. Hon. Michael J. Scott: Yes, right. The recital. Bermuda House of Assembly Mr. Mark J. Pettingill: The word “handling” in the Bill, in the citation— Hon. Michael J. Scott: The recital …
19 May 2017 House of Assembly
Official Hansard Report
44 words
Sorry, I said summary. Yes, it uses the word . . . “handling” needs to be deleted. We will com e to that in a later stage because we are deleting section 3 in its entirety. An Hon . Member: The words “and handling”.
19 May 2017 House of Assembly
Official Hansard Report
16 words
[The words] “and handling” — thank you. So it is the words “and handling.” [Inaudible interjections]
19 May 2017 House of Assembly
Official Hansard Report
4 words
Yes, yes. [Inaudible interjections]
19 May 2017 House of Assembly
Official Hansard Report
7 words
[The word] “possession” and delete “and handling.”
19 May 2017 House of Assembly
Official Hansard Report
66 words
So, it would read “WHEREAS it is expedient to amend the Misuse” (which now would be the Misuse of Drugs (Decriminalisation of Cannabis) Amendment Act 2017) [sic] “to remove criminal sanctions in relation to the possession” . . . and then the words “and handling” will be deleted. So it will read “ . . . in relation to the …
19 May 2017 House of Assembly
Official Hansard Report
390 words
If I may just briefly, I am obliged. Let me just speak to the reasoning here, so that me m bers of the public understand, and if any Members of the House are not following, it has to be . . . the Director of Public Prosecutions is the only per-son, constitutionally, Madam Chairman, that can bring a prosecution, and …
19 May 2017 House of Assembly
Official Hansard Report
16 words
Sorry, I thought I did. I just did. So, what we are adding is [clause] 2(2).
19 May 2017 House of Assembly
Official Hansard Report
4 words
I just read it.
19 May 2017 House of Assembly
Official Hansard Report
9 words
Do y ou want me to read it again?
19 May 2017 House of Assembly
Official Hansard Report
4 words
“Subject to the discretion—
19 May 2017 House of Assembly
Official Hansard Report
24 words
—“of the Director of Public Prosecutions to prosecute if the evidence indicates intent to supply contrary to section 6(3) of the principal Act.” Okay?
19 May 2017 House of Assembly
Official Hansard Report
6 words
Hold on, Madam Chairman, sorry —
19 May 2017 House of Assembly
Official Hansard Report
70 words
My learned friend, Mr. Croc kwell, is pointing out something here that I think is quite right. Okay, [clause] 2 of the proposed Bill amends section 6(1) of the principal Act. So what we really should be doing is making that first part [clause 2 ] (1), and I have not done that amendment (if you are following Honourable Member …
19 May 2017 House of Assembly
Official Hansard Report
27 words
Okay, so the amendment . . . so “Section 6(1) of the principal Act is repealed and replaced with the following:” —the repeal should read “[Clause] 2(1).”
19 May 2017 House of Assembly
Official Hansard Report
21 words
And then I have amended that to add [clause] 2(2). Hon. Michael J. Scott: I follow. I am looking at —
19 May 2017 House of Assembly
Official Hansard Report
135 words
[microphone off ] I am looking now at the proposed sentence, “Amends Section 6 of the principal Act”. “Section 6 (1) of the principal Act is repealed and replaced with the following: ‘Subject to any regulations under section 12 for the time being in force, no person shall have a controlled drug in his possession, save for cannabis that is …